A Lack of Shade

We inherit structures. Governments and policies. Cities and technologies. Little 18-month-old you didn’t look around and ask, “Are we really legislating coal power the right way?” You probably just ate your fruit snack and assumed that the world was perfectly designed. If there was a problem, you may have been led to believe, it was merely with your attitude.

As grown-ups, we realize how intensely most of humanity is just winging it. Our civilization is a result of that. Our rules and institutions were constructed by people who were comically certain of their correctness and virtue. While ideas are ephemeral, they can be transformed into structures. And the more material those structures are, the longer they live on.

Brits are, right now, cooking under the highest temperatures on record. Let’s put climate change aside for a moment and instead zoom in on urban design. Many British homes are sweltering because of a lack of insulation and/or shade. Britain’s rush to industrialization is blamed for the shoddy construction (”just burn more coal!”) but the spacing is a much wilder story It turns out that a couple of urban designers walked apart in a field until they could no longer see each other’s nipples through their shirts. That continues to be the distance used to space out many British homes. In case you’re wondering, it’s 70 ft (21 metres). That tells us three things:

• Cultural mores were codified into design standards that still exist – 120 years later
• Practical realities, like sun and wind, were not considered or prioritized
• The designers, Unwin and Parker, had eagle eyes

The wise plant trees — the shade of which will only be enjoyed by future generations.

—Paraphrased from Cicero

Of course, survival and optimal health are different. When you are in nice, healthy ranges, you tolerate disruption better than when you are not. Without getting into the mental and emotional pieces of this, it is because you are nutritionally topped-up and have a reserve.

The structures of our environments and cultures make some actions easier and others harder. So, while a truly committed person can swim against the current it sure is easier when we can swim with it And if the current itself is a problem, we have to ask how to can reverse – or it. We know we're just a group of humble personal trainers in Toronto but we do our best to think about how to look at upstream factors in our collective health.

As a thought experiment, imagine a city that was centred around your health. What would you design for?

Some prompts:

• How far would work be from home (if at all)?
• How would you get around Mostly by car? Or by foot, bike, horse and buggy?
• What kinds of social activities would be most accessible (and how often would they be oriented around physical activity, time outdoors, learning, or deep relaxation)?

Thinking about what could be is the fun part. The challenging – but worthwhile – part is to figure out how to integrate (or advocate for) this stuff in a way that can work without a billion-dollar budget, a century of innovation, or an obsession with nipples.